ERCP

What Is ERCP?

An interventional endoscopic procedure used mainly to treat stones, strictures, leaks and obstruction in the bile or pancreatic ducts.

ERCP hasta rehberiDoç. Dr. Süleyman Günay
01Typical durationDuration varies with the indication and treatment
02Comfort planSedation or anaesthesia is individually planned
03Observation / stayDay case or inpatient observation when clinically needed
04ResultsInitial findings the same day; pathology later
PHYSICIAN · EVIDENCE · EXPERIENCE

ERCP and Assoc. Prof. Süleyman Günay

This page connects scientific guidance, relevant conditions and diagnostics, verifiable congress/live-case records involving Süleyman Günay, and the patient decision pathway. The records do not claim superiority or guarantee an outcome.

Open physician profile →Source-linked academic archive →
7scientific sources linked to this page11related verifiable academic records6connected patient-pathway guides
International faculty · Session chairManchester Advanced Endoscopy Symposium 20262026-07-16 · Open primary source ↗
EVIDENCE DEPTH · GUIDELINES · PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH

ERCP evidence review: a therapeutic decision platform rather than a routine diagnostic test

Modern ERCP is primarily a therapeutic procedure. The central question is not simply whether the ducts can be entered, but whether ERCP is needed to solve a defined problem and whether it is being performed at the right time. MRCP and EUS have shifted many purely diagnostic questions away from ERCP, while drainage, stone extraction, stricture therapy and stenting remain core indications.

Knowledge sharing knows no borders.

Doç. Dr. Süleyman GünayFrom his statement on scientific collaboration and advanced-endoscopy education during the MENA EUS programme.Translation note: the original statement is in Turkish.
Direct quotation sourceMENA EUS CLUB 7th Endoscopy Course · birincil basın dokümanı · 2025

1. The therapeutic goal should be explicit before ERCP

A reported bile-duct or pancreatic-duct abnormality does not by itself mandate ERCP. In suspected choledocholithiasis, symptoms, liver tests, ultrasound and, when appropriate, MRCP or EUS are used to estimate whether a treatable duct stone is sufficiently likely. When the probability is not high enough for immediate therapy, a lower-risk confirmatory test may be preferable. In contrast, cholangitis, persistent biliary obstruction, a confirmed duct stone, selected leaks or clinically important strictures may require ERCP for decompression and treatment rather than diagnosis alone.

Stricture management has its own decision pathway. Benign versus malignant probability, location, altered anatomy, associated mass lesions and whether tissue diagnosis will change treatment all matter. ERCP-based sampling, EUS-guided tissue acquisition and cross-sectional imaging should therefore be sequenced to complement one another. The procedural aim should be concrete—drain an obstruction, extract a stone, treat a leak or obtain clinically meaningful sampling while restoring flow—rather than simply “visualise the duct.”

2. Risk reduction is part of ERCP, not an afterthought

ERCP can be highly beneficial, but its adverse-event profile is different from routine diagnostic endoscopy. Post-ERCP pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, perforation and sedation-related events should be discussed as part of the decision. Risk is not captured well by quoting a single generic percentage; previous post-ERCP pancreatitis, anticipated difficult cannulation, sphincterotomy, antithrombotic therapy, active infection, anatomy and comorbidity all modify the individual risk profile.

High-quality ERCP therefore includes medication planning, infection assessment, evidence-based prophylaxis where appropriate, confirmation of adequate drainage, post-procedure observation and a written follow-up pathway. If a temporary stent is placed, the removal or exchange date becomes a safety-critical part of care. Cytology or pathology and the clinical/laboratory response should be reviewed deliberately rather than treated as an incidental result after the technical procedure is over.

3. After failed conventional ERCP, rescue options depend on anatomy and expertise

When biliary drainage is still required after conventional ERCP fails, there is no single automatic rescue route. The reason for failure may be inaccessible papilla, surgically altered anatomy, malignant obstruction or difficult cannulation. Repeat ERCP in an expert setting, EUS-guided biliary drainage, percutaneous drainage and surgery can all be appropriate depending on urgency, anatomy and local capability.

The 2024 ASGE therapeutic-EUS guideline places EUS-guided biliary drainage as an important option after failed ERCP in selected patients. That should not be interpreted as universal superiority. Level of obstruction, ascites or vascular relationships, future surgical or oncological plans and the team’s therapeutic-EUS experience all influence the choice. A rigorous ERCP guide must therefore explain not only how ERCP is performed, but also when another strategy is safer or more informative.

This evidence review is for general information. Guideline recommendations cannot be converted into an individual treatment recommendation without considering anatomy, comorbidities, previous therapy and current clinical findings.

From the patient perspective

What should you expect from this procedure?

1AssessmentRight indication
2PreparationFasting · medicines · support
3ProcedureSedation + treatment
4RecoveryObservation · debrief
5Follow-upResults · pathology · review
Quick view

What should be clear before, during and after the procedure?

WhenWhat to clarifyWhy it matters
BeforeFasting, medicines, blood thinners, escort and the purpose of the procedureAffects safety and planning
Procedure daySedation/anaesthesia, possible additional intervention and observation timeClarifies expectations and consent
AfterDiet, medicines, driving, results/pathology and warning signsSupports safe recovery and follow-up
Quick answer

An interventional endoscopic procedure used mainly to treat stones, strictures, leaks and obstruction in the bile or pancreatic ducts. Suitability and preparation must be personalised after clinical review.

Expert summary

ERCP is an interventional endoscopic procedure used to remove bile or pancreatic duct stones, treat or sample strictures, manage leaks and place stents. When diagnosis alone is needed, MRCP or EUS is usually considered first. Urgent drainage may be required for cholangitis or ongoing obstruction; pancreatitis, bleeding, infection and perforation risks are assessed for the individual patient.

01

What is it?

An interventional endoscopic procedure used mainly to treat stones, strictures, leaks and obstruction in the bile or pancreatic ducts.

It is planned as an individual clinical pathway based on symptoms, previous tests, anatomy and treatment goals. Suitability cannot be decided from a web page alone. Expected benefits, alternatives, sedation or anaesthesia and follow-up are discussed before consent. The goal is safe recovery and an appropriate long-term plan as well as technical success.

R
SECTION-LEVEL EVIDENCE

Evidence map for this guide

The organisations and guidelines used for each section are mapped below.

Overview2 sources
Decision3 sources
Indications4 sources
Preparation3 sources
Procedure4 sources
Aftercare3 sources
Alternatives3 sources
Risks5 sources
Follow-up3 sources
Urgent warnings3 sources
FAQ1 sources
02

How is this procedure selected?

ERCP is not automatic simply because a duct abnormality has been reported. Blood tests and ultrasound/CT, MRCP or EUS first clarify whether a stone, stricture, leak or obstruction requires therapy. Cholangitis or persistent obstruction may make timing urgent; a non-invasive test comes first when diagnosis alone is required. Altered anatomy, antithrombotic medicines, infection and post-ERCP pancreatitis risk shape the plan.

Key principle

The clinical question—not the procedure name—drives the plan. If a simpler and safer method can answer the same question, it should be discussed first.

03

When is it considered?

This procedure may be considered in the situations below. The list is not a diagnosis or a treatment decision; test findings and individual risks must be interpreted together.

  • Symptoms or test findings related to this procedure
  • Need for detailed diagnosis, tissue sampling or endoscopic treatment
  • A specialist review showing that expected benefit outweighs individual risk
04

Preparation timeline

This is a general pathway. Your personalised written hospital instructions and medicine plan always take priority.

Before booking

Share your complete health history

Tell the team about blood thinners, diabetes medicines, allergies, pregnancy, heart or lung disease and previous anaesthesia problems. Never stop prescribed medicine without an individual plan.

Before the procedure

Follow your written preparation plan

Fasting, bowel preparation and medicine timing depend on the procedure and your health. The instructions from your treating unit take priority over general web information.

On the day

Bring records and arrange support

Bring imaging, reports and an up-to-date medicine list. If sedation is planned, arrange a responsible adult to take you home and do not drive.

Before discharge

Confirm the recovery plan

Ask about diet, medicines, expected symptoms, pathology results, follow-up and the warning signs that require urgent contact.

05

What happens during the procedure?

The exact steps depend on the indication and findings. Monitoring, comfort and safety continue throughout the procedure; any possible therapeutic step is discussed during consent.

1Identity and safety checks2Sedation or anaesthesia plan3Endoscopic procedure4Recovery and debrief
06

Aftercare and recovery

Recovery, diet, medicines and discharge are individualised. If tissue is obtained, arrange how and when the pathology result will be reviewed with the clinical team.

Ask before you leave

When can I eat? When do I restart medicines? Can I drive? Who will explain pathology results and when? When is follow-up?

07

Alternatives and comparison options

The same technique is not appropriate for every patient. These options may be compared according to the clinical question, anatomy, disease extent and general health.

  • MRCP or EUS when diagnosis alone is required
  • Percutaneous drainage by interventional radiology when endoscopic access is not feasible
  • Surgery according to the nature of the stone, stricture or anatomy
  • Additional imaging and multidisciplinary review for uncertain findings that do not require urgent treatment
08

Risks and safety

Every medical intervention carries risk. Probability varies with the scope of treatment, technique and your individual health.

  • Bleeding, infection or a reaction to sedation
  • A tear or perforation, with risk varying by the intervention
  • Procedure-specific complications discussed during consent
  • Need for observation, repeat endoscopy, radiology or surgery in uncommon cases
09

Results and long-term follow-up

Follow-up covers clinical and laboratory response after stone extraction, the cause and sampling result of a stricture, and a written removal or exchange date for every temporary stent. Cytology or pathology should be reviewed in a dedicated result discussion.

Questions you may want to ask your doctor

  • What exact clinical question is this procedure expected to answer?
  • Is the aim diagnosis, treatment, tissue sampling or more than one of these?
  • What are the reasonable alternatives in my case?
  • How should I manage blood thinners, diabetes medicines and fasting?
  • What findings could change the plan during the procedure?
  • When and how will I receive pathology or final results?
!

When should I seek urgent help?

If any of the following occurs, do not wait for a routine web response; seek urgent medical care where you are.

  • Severe or worsening chest or abdominal pain
  • Fever, chills or marked weakness
  • Vomiting blood, black stool or heavy rectal bleeding
  • Breathing difficulty, fainting or confusion
  • Persistent vomiting, inability to drink or increasing abdominal swelling
?

Frequently asked questions

Will it hurt?+

Comfort is planned according to the procedure and your health, often with sedation or anaesthesia support. Expected symptoms and pain relief are explained before discharge.

Can I go home the same day?+

Many procedures are day cases, but the extent of treatment, other illnesses or observation needs can require an overnight stay.

Should I stop my medicines?+

Never stop prescribed medicines on your own. Blood thinners and diabetes medicines require an individual written plan.

When will I receive results?+

Visual findings may be discussed immediately. Biopsy or resection results take longer and should be interpreted with the treating clinician.

i

Author: Doç. Dr. Süleyman Günay
Medical review status: Awaiting physician verification
Last medical review: 2026-09-13
Read our medical content and evidence policy →

R

Scientific References

Official guidelines, scientific articles and patient information sources used for this page. Source links open in a new tab.

  1. ASGE · 2024 · clinical guidelineAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of therapeutic EUS in the management of biliary tract disorders: summary and recommendationsDOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.027PMID: 39078360
    Open source ↗
  2. NIDDK – U.S. National Institutes of Health · Current · patient guidanceERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography)
    Open source ↗
  3. ASGE · 2019 · clinical guidelineASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasisDOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001
    Open source ↗
  4. ESGE · 2020 · clinical guidelineERCP-related adverse events: ESGE GuidelineDOI: 10.1055/a-1075-4080
    Open source ↗
  5. Türk Gastroenteroloji Derneği (TGD) · Current · national societyTürk Gastroenteroloji Derneği – Hasta ve Mesleki Bilgi Kaynakları
    Open source ↗
  6. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) · Current · guideline libraryClinical Guidelines and Position Statements
    Open source ↗
  7. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) · Current · guideline libraryASGE Clinical Practice Guidelines
    Open source ↗
Request an Appointment WhatsApp World InstagramLinkedInGoogle Scholar